Hazing Allegations Spur Calls for Discrete Criminal Offence

Recent allegations of hazing at the University of Sydney’s St. Paul’s College, where students allegedly gagged a fellow student with a sex toy during a mock trial, has sent shockwaves across the community and sparked fresh calls for legal reforms, including that parliament consider enacting a discrete criminal offence of hazing.

The allegations also draw focus on a deeper issue within Australia’s elite university campuses, where hazing traditions have long flourished, and many believe have been shielded by outdated governance and lack of legal repercussions.

Allegations of Hazing and Abuse

The incident reportedly took place as part of an initiation ritual, at St. Paul’s College, one of Australia’s oldest and most prestigious residential colleges.

This particular incident involved a “mock trial,” during which a student was gagged with a sex toy, an action that has led many to question the safety and ethics within these college environments.

While this episode has received media attention, it’s only the latest in a series of troubling allegations over the years involving St. Paul’s and other University of Sydney colleges, where students have claimed that they have been subjected to various forms of hazing and harassment.

Legal and Cultural Barriers to Reform

One of the main obstacles to ending hazing at institutions like St. Paul’s College is the college’s autonomy from the university.

Established under an Act of Parliament in the 1850s, St. Paul’s and other residential colleges operate with a degree of independence, which complicates the University of Sydney’s ability to enforce its policies.

This has left college administrations largely responsible for governing student conduct internally, often resulting in inadequate oversight and accountability.

In 2018, the University of Sydney implemented its Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment (SASH) policy, which explicitly bans hazing. However, enforcement remains a significant challenge, as colleges like St. Paul’s are not directly under university jurisdiction.

University representatives, including former Vice-Chancellor Michael Spence, have acknowledged the limitations of their authority, pointing to the need for structural reform.

Australia’s Legislative Gap on Hazing

Unlike the United States, Canada, and other countries, Australia lacks specific anti-hazing laws.

Many American states have stringent anti-hazing laws that criminalise activities causing physical or psychological harm to students involved in initiation rituals.

These laws have led to prosecutions and heightened accountability, deterring future abuses. In Australia, there’s no comparable legal framework, leaving hazing incidents largely unaddressed by criminal law unless they involve assault or other criminal offences.

In light of these gaps, advocacy groups such as End Rape on Campus Australia have called for reform.

A recent report known as The Red Zone documented systemic abuse and hazing within university colleges, including incidents of sexual harassment, verbal abuse, and physical intimidation, and recommended forming a federal task force to oversee hazing policies nationwide.

This report underscored how unchecked power structures at these colleges foster an environment where students may feel compelled to participate in demeaning and dangerous rituals.

Calls for Reform

This latest hazing incident at St. Paul’s highlights a critical need for Australia to introduce a criminal offence specifically prohibiting hazing in educational and other institutions. A discrete criminal offence would send a clear message that such conduct is not only unacceptable, but amounts to a crime.

Such a move was recently made in relation to coercive control in domestic situations, which could but did not always amount to a criminal offence under existing legal framework which included assault offences and the offence of stalking or intimidation with intent to cause physical or mental harm, as well as apprehended domestic violence orders.

The concern is that without sufficient legal deterrents, traditions will continue to perpetuate a dangerous cycle of abuse, negatively impacting countless students. Many advocates argue that such legislative measures would create a safer, more respectful environment for students.

The recent outcry has brought hazing issues to the forefront of public debate, placing pressure on both college administrations and the Australian government to act. Changing the culture within these institutions is crucial, but legal reforms are also necessary to prevent future incidents.

If you or someone you know has been charged with a criminal offence, contact Sydney Criminal Lawyers. Our experienced lawyers provide expert guidance and representation