Section 70.2 Criminal Code Act 1995
Bribing a Foreign Public Official

published on
updated on
Information on this page was reviewed by a specialist defence lawyer before being published. Click to read more.

Bribing a foreign public official is an offence under section 70.2 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and/or 10,000 penalty units for an individual, or, for companies, the greatest of 100,000 penalty units, 3 times any benefit derived from the conduct or 10% of annual turnover.

To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:

  1. You provided a benefit to another person, or you caused a benefit to be provided to another person, or you offered or promised to provide a benefit to another person, or you caused an offer or promise of a benefit to be provided to another person, and
  2. You did so intending to improperly influence a foreign public official in the exercise of his or her duties as a foreign public official, in order to obtain or retain business, or obtain or retain a business advantage that is not legitimately due.

A ‘foreign public official’ is defined as:

  1. an employee or official of a foreign government body
  2. A person who performs contractual work for a foreign government body
  3. A person who holds or performs duties of an appointment, office or position under a law of a foreign country or part thereof
  4. A person who holds or performs the duties of an appointment, office or position created by custom or convention of a foreign country or part thereof
  5. A person who otherwise serves a foreign government body
  6. A member of the executive, judiciary or magistracy of a foreign country
  7. An employee of a public international organisation
  8. A person who performs contractual work for a public international organisation
  9. A person who holds or performs the duties of an office or position in a public international organisation
  10. A person who otherwise serves a public international organisation
  11. A member or officer of the legislature of a foreign country, or
  12. A person who is an authorised intermediary of a foreign public official, or holds himself or herself out to be the authorised intermediary of a foreign public official

The prosecution does not need to prove that:

  1. It was your intention to influence a particular foreign public official, or
  2. An advantage was actually obtained or retained.

The following matters are irrelevant to any determination of whether a benefit or advantage was legitimately due:

  1. That the benefit was customary, or perceived as customary, to the particular situation
  2. That the benefit was minor, and
  3. That there was official tolerance of the benefit.

You are not guilty of the offence if:

  1. You held a position with a foreign government, agency or body
  2. Your conduct occurred in that foreign country, and
  3. Your conduct was lawful in that country.

You are also not guilty if:

  1. The value of the benefit was minor
  2. Your conduct was for the sole purpose of expediting or securing the performance of a routine government action of a minor nature
  3. You made a record of your conduct as soon as practicable after it occurred, and
  4. You retained a copy of that record, or the record was destroyed through actions that were out of your control, or the prosecution was instituted more than 7 years after the conduct occurred.

Duress is also a defence to the charge.

If you are going to court for Bribing a Foreign Public Official, call Sydney Criminal Lawyers 24/7 on (02) 9261 8881 to arrange a free first conference with an experienced defence lawyer who will advise you of your options and the best way forward, and fight to secure the optimal outcome.

Read on for more information.

The Legislation

70.2  Bribing a foreign public official

 (1) A person commits an offence if:

 (a) the person:

 (i) provides a benefit to another person; or

 (ii) causes a benefit to be provided to another person; or

 (iii) offers to provide, or promises to provide, a benefit to another person; or

 (iv) causes an offer of the provision of a benefit, or a promise of the provision of a benefit, to be made to another person; and

 (b) the first‑mentioned person does so with the intention of improperly influencing a foreign public official (who may be the other person) in order to obtain or retain business or a business or personal advantage (whether or not for the first‑mentioned person).

Note: See also section 70.2A. For defences, see sections 70.3 and 70.4.

 (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b):

 (a) the first‑mentioned person does not need to intend to influence a particular foreign public official; and

 (b) the first‑mentioned person does not need to intend to obtain or retain particular business or a particular business or personal advantage; and

 (c) business, or a business or personal advantage, does not need to be actually obtained or retained.

Penalty for individual

 (3) An offence against subsection (1) committed by an individual is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for not more than 10 years, a fine not more than 10,000 penalty units, or both.

Penalty for body corporate

 (4) An offence against subsection (1) committed by a body corporate is punishable on conviction by a fine not more than the greatest of the following:

 (a) 100,000 penalty units;

 (b) if the court can determine the value of the benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the conduct constituting the offence—3 times the value of that benefit;

 (c) if the court cannot determine the value of that benefit—10% of the annual turnover of the body corporate during the period (the turnover period) of 12 months ending at the end of the month in which the body corporate committed, or began committing, the offence.

70.2A  Improper influence

Determination to be a matter for the trier of fact

 (1) In a prosecution for an offence against section 70.2, the determination of whether influence is improper is a matter for the trier of fact.

Matters that must be disregarded

 (2) In determining whether influence is improper for the purposes of paragraph 70.2(1)(b), a trier of fact must disregard the following:

 (a) the fact that the benefit, or the offer or promise to provide the benefit, may be, or be perceived to be, customary, necessary or required in the situation;

 (b) any official tolerance of the benefit;

 (c) if particular business or a particular business or personal advantage is relevant to proving the matters referred to in that paragraph—the following:

 (i) if the value of the business or advantage is insignificant—that fact;

 (ii) in the case of an advantage—any official tolerance of the advantage;

 (iii) in the case of an advantage—the fact that the advantage may be customary, or perceived to be customary, in the situation.

Matters to which regard may be had

 (3) In determining whether influence is improper for the purposes of paragraph 70.2(1)(b), a trier of fact may have regard to the following:

 (a) the recipient or intended recipient of the benefit;

 (b) the nature of the benefit;

 (c) the manner of the provision of the benefit (or, if applicable, the offered or promised manner of the provision of the benefit);

 (d) whether the value of the benefit is disproportionate to the value of any consideration provided or purported to have been provided for the benefit;

 (e) if the benefit was provided, or the offer or promise to provide the benefit was made, in the absence of any legal obligation to do so—that fact;

 (f) whether the benefit was provided, or the offer or promise to provide the benefit was made, dishonestly;

 (g) whether, and to what extent, the provision of the benefit, or the offer or promise to provide the benefit, is recorded or documented;

 (h) if the provision of the benefit, or the offer or promise to provide the benefit, is recorded or documented:

 (i) the accuracy of the record or documentation; and

 (ii) whether the record or documentation is consistent with the ordinary practices of the person who made the record or documentation;

 (i) whether there is evidence that due diligence was exercised by the first‑mentioned person in section 70.2 in relation to the benefit, or the offer or promise to provide the benefit;

 (j) whether any of the following conduct is contrary to a written law in force in the place where that conduct occurs:

 (i) the provision of the benefit, or the offer or promise to provide the benefit;

 (ii) the acceptance of the benefit;

 (iii) any conduct directly connected with conduct referred to in subparagraph (i) or (ii);

 (k) if particular business or a particular business or personal advantage is relevant to proving the matters referred to in that paragraph—the following:

 (i) whether the business or advantage was awarded on a competitive or non‑commercial basis;

 (ii) whether there is any demonstrable conflict of interest in the provision of the business or advantage.

 (4) To avoid doubt, subsection (3) does not limit the matters to which the trier of fact may have regard.

Why Choose Sydney Criminal Lawyers®?

Going to court can be nerve-racking, but having a strong and compassionate legal team behind you can make the experience significantly easier to deal with.

Here are 12 reasons to choose our multi-award winning legal team:

  1. Proven Track Record of Exceptional Results

    Sydney Criminal Lawyers® consistently achieves outcomes which are in the highest percentile of the Judicial Commission’s sentencing statistics for criminal cases.

    Our legal team devises effective case-strategies and fights hard to have cases dropped entirely or charges downgraded – saving clients the time, expense and stress of a defended hearing or jury trial.

    Where cases nevertheless proceed, our lawyers have an outstanding track record of winning defended Local Court hearings, and complex jury trials in the District and Supreme Courts.

    We also consistently win appeals in the District and Supreme Courts (including the NSWCCA) after clients have received unsatisfactory results with other law firms in the lower courts.We are one of the few firms to achieve successful criminal law appeals in the High Court of Australia.

    Where our clients wish to plead guilty, we frequently achieve ‘dismissals’ and ‘non convictions’ in cases where other lawyers have advised there is no chance of doing so.

  2. Highest Level of Client Satisfaction

    We have the best and most comprehensive client review record of any law firm in Australia.

    Regular communication, accessibility and quality service are our team’s highest priorities.

    We are committed to thoroughly explaining all steps involved in the criminal law process, providing regular updates throughout the proceedings, and making ourselves accessible and responsive.

    We are passionate about providing an exceptional level of service to our clients, and we fight hard to achieve optimal results in the shortest period of time.

  3. Australia’s Most Awarded Criminal Law Firm

    We have received more awards and accolades than any other criminal law firm in Australia. Our team has been awarded “Criminal Defence Firm of the Year in Australia” in a number of prestigious and competitive awards programs for several years running.

    The awards recognise our exceptional track record of results, our outstanding client service, the high level of satisfaction we achieve, the affordability of our services and our overall excellence.

  4. Fixed Fees

    We want our clients to know exactly how much their cases will cost from the very start. That’s why we were the first criminal law firm in Australia to publish ‘fixed fees’, back in 2004.

    We offer fixed fees for most types of criminal cases and services.Our fixed fees apply to a range of Local Court cases such as drink driving, drug possession, fraud, common assault and AVOs, and also specific services such as prison visits, bail applications, appeals and defended hearings.

    Unlike many other law firms, our fixed fees are published on our website – which ensures transparency and certainty.

  5. Free First Appointment

    For those who are going to court, we offer a free first conference of up to an hour with one of our Senior Criminal Defence Lawyers.

    We also offer a free first conference to those who have received an unsatisfactory result after being represented in court by another law firm, or after representing themselves, and wish to appeal.

  6. Specialist Lawyer Guarantee

    We guarantee that only lawyers with substantial criminal defence experience will work on your case and appear for you in court.

    This ensures our clients receive the highest quality representation from an experienced, specialist criminal lawyer.

  7. All NSW Courts

    From Bombala to Broken Hill, our lawyers appear in courts throughout New South Wales – and across Australia for Commonwealth cases.

    And we offer fixed fees for most criminal and traffic law cases throughout the state.

  8. Accredited Specialists

    Our entire firm is exclusively dedicated to criminal law – which makes us true specialists.

    All of our lawyers have years of experience representing clients in criminal cases, and our principal has been certified by the Law Society of NSW as an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist since 2005.

    An ‘Accredited Specialist’ is a lawyer who has practised for at least 5 years in a particular field of law (such as criminal law), has passed a rigorous assessment process conducted by the Law Society of NSW, and has been selected by the Specialist Accreditation Committee of the Law Society as an expert in the field.

    Accredited Specialists are required to undertake more training each year than other lawyers and must be successful in having their accreditation renewed every year. Specialist Accreditation is the mark of a true specialist.

    Our firm’s specialist experience ensures you receive the best possible result, whatever your criminal law case may be.

  9. Results-Focused Law Firm

    Our team is passionate about achieving results, and unlike many other law firms, our lawyers do not have monthly financial ‘budgets’ to meet.

    The absence of budgets means our lawyers are entirely focused on achieving optimal results in the shortest space of time; whether by getting charges dropped or downgraded at an early stage or having cases ‘thrown out of court’.

    Not having budgets also means our lawyers are not under pressure to engage in unscrupulous practices such as unnecessarily adjourning cases or ‘overcharging’ clients – which, sadly, is a common complaint against many other lawyers and law firms.

    No budgets encourages regular consultation between lawyers within the firm – promoting an ‘open door’, team environment where lawyers bounce ideas off one another, formulate case strategy together and benefit from each other’s specialised experience, methods, techniques and insights.

    The result is a firm which delivers optimal outcomes in the shortest time periods, at the least expense and stress to our clients.

  10. Team of Lawyers Behind You

    Our clients benefit from the pool of knowledge that only an extensive team of experienced criminal defence lawyers can provide.

    Our lawyers regularly consult one another to stay ‘ahead of the pack’ in the ever-changing field of criminal law – constantly devising, refining and implementing specialised techniques which ensure our clients achieve the best possible outcomes.

    A team approach is particularly important when it comes to serious criminal cases such as murder, commercial drug cases, serious and sexual assaults, large-scale fraud, robbery and other ‘indictable’ cases.

    In such matters, clients reap the benefits of several lawyers devising and executing case strategies which maximise the chances of having cases dropped or downgraded at an early stage, or ‘thrown out of court’ – often saving clients a great deal of cost, time and anxiety.

  11. Familiar with Magistrates and Judges

    Each of our lawyers appears in court on a daily basis, and has done so for years. We have therefore been able to develop an understanding of, and rapport with, magistrates and judges in Sydney and indeed across the state.

    Our team’s extensive experience before the courts ensures your case is tailored to the specific nuances of individual judicial officers, maximising the likelihood of a favourable result.

  12. Convenience

    We have offices in locations across the Sydney Metropolitan Area and beyond, including:

    We offer free parking at our Sydney CBD offices, and all of our offices are close to train stations and bus terminals.

    For those who are unable to attend our offices, we offer conferences by telephone, Skye and FaceTime anywhere around the world.

    If you are going to court and wish to arrange a free first consultation, call our 24 hour hotline on (02) 9261 8881 or send us an email at info@sydneycriminallawyers.com.au.

Going to Court? (02) 9261 8881

Related Videos

Menu

APPOINTMENT BOOKING

Preferred date for conference
Briefly describe your situation:
Do you have a court date?

Your Review & Rating
* mandatory fields

Review Text *
Rating (optional)