Failure to comply with a dedicated encrypted criminal communication device access order, or DECCD access order, is an offence under section 80O of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 which carries a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison.
To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:
You gave an executing officer information that was false or misleading in a material particular in purported compliance with the order without informing the officer that the information was false or misleading, and
A ‘relevant person’ is a person to whom a DECCD access order applies.
A DECCD is defined by section 192O of the Crimes Act 1900 as a mobile electronic device that:
Examples of key features usually available on a device may include voice call, web browser and geolocation services.
Examples of configurations intended to impede law enforcement may include:
‘Serious criminal activity’ is defined as:
Applications for DECCD access orders are made under Part 5A, Division 2 of the LEPRA.
A ‘reasonable excuse’ for not complying with a DECCD access order does not include the fact that complying would tend to incriminate you or otherwise expose you to a penalty.
You are not guilty of the offence of failing to comply with a DECCD if you establish, on the balance of probabilities, that you had a reasonable excuse for your conduct.
General legal defences to the offence include duress, necessity and self-defence.
If you are able to raise evidence of a general legal defence, the onus then shifts to the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defence does not apply to the circumstances of the case.
You are entitled to an acquittal if the prosecution is unable to do this.